It is clear that the conventions of imperialism make Orwell feel compelled to perform a particular inhumane and irrational role. In the essay he writes not just about his personal experience with the elephant but how metaphorical the experience is to Imperialism and his views on the matter.
The more cruelties the imperials perpetrate, the more stubborn the locals grow. Apart from that Orwell uses his voice to retain the comic flavour he has injected into the essay to make it highly engaging.
The animal is calmly eating grass. Orwell fells his strong hatred and tries not to be laughed at by the locals. Orwell also uses some connotations and denotations in the essay.
Against his will and moral belief he decides to kill the elephant. This is where he has an epiphany: Under these conditions, it was impossible not to have mixed feelings, to put it mildly, about his role in Imperial Burma.
The essay has a comic and sarcastic tone and Orwell uses this interesting incident to explain the situation unfolding in Burma.
At times these interactions might take a favourable turn and be less biter like when the elephant as on rampage. Yet, as he states in " Shooting an Elephant ," he could not help but feel a visceral dislike of many of the Burmese simply because of the hostility they understandably showed towards him.
Orwell knows that the elephant, though it has been violent and has killed a man during its attack of "must," has now become harmless and that there is no reason to kill it.
If it was not for the violence they perpetrated the hatred inside the natives would have been less strong. It is presented in the form of an account of people caged aside small and stinky prison cells. Apart from the evils of imperialism, it is also a very personal essay in which Orwell expresses how he personally sees things and how he cannot support the evil of imperialism.
The transitions he makes between narration and the actual story is so subtle the flow of the essay is easy to read. Orwell draws a stark picture of the cruelties meted out to the local people by their oppressors.
Orwell fires again, and the elephant does not fall—instead, it wobbles back onto its feet. Finally staying down after the third shot the elephant still lives, just as the Burmese people are still there but with less strength and hope after the wars.
It was quite likely that several of them hated him enough to kill him if they could dare to. Over everything else it shows that the imperialists have achieved everything meaningless there in Burma. At the end he goes on to pour bullets into the elephant just to ensure it is dead.
With the second shot he tried to get back on his feet and the third shot brought him down but he seemed to be struggling to remain on his feet till at last he fell. Shortly thereafter, the Burmese stripped the meat off its bones. There are two powerful symbols used in the essay to deliver its central message and they are the elephant and the rifle.
Orwell uses not one but two rifles to kill the elephant and still it keeps breathing and dies half an hour later than Orwell has poured several bullets into it and left the scene. For example, much like the Burmese who have been colonized and who abuse Orwell, the elephant has been provoked to destructive behavior by being oppressed.
He had trumpeted just once before falling and his breathing continued after he fell.
The incident portrayed in the essay took place in Moulmein, now known as Mawlamyine. Especially the Buddhist monks all around Burma are so good at teasing that Orwell hopes he would drive his bayonet through one of them some day.
He blends his own personal thoughts and opinion into his story. The Burmese people and their oppressors were not into a cordial relationship which is evident from the account Orwell presents.
That was the shot that did it for him. He knew that the British had no right to take over other people's countries and exploit them.
The crowd roars in excitement, and the elephant appears suddenly weakened. The prisons especially presented rich evidence regarding the wrongdoings of the British. This style helps him deliver the point with the effectiveness he wants.
He describes the feeling to be like theatre curtains finally opening to a waiting spectators. Despite a strong anti European feeling among the natives making him feel guilty and bitter, the author could not help feeling for the helpless local people who just did not have better means to express their anguish and disgust over imperial forces.
Orwell explicitly states his allegiance to the Burmese people and his opposition to the power that he himself embodies, as imperial police officer and face of the British Empire.
This quote is important because of how clearly it explains Orwell’s feelings for his work and his position in Burma. For example he refers to the large crowd of people behind him as “an army of people.” Not only does army make the reader think of a large crowd but to be military-like and force Orwell to change his actions.
George Orwell’s Shooting An Elephant is a great essay combining personal experience and. Book Report on George Orwell's Burmese Days The book “Burmese Days” was written by George Orwell and published first in Orwell took the inspiration for this first novel of his from the experiences he gained during his service as an imperial police officer in Burma in the late s.
He also talks about his ambiguous attitude towards the Burmese people who ridicule and mock him because of anti-European feelings and towards the British Empire whose “dirty show more content Shooting an Elephant” is an autobiographically influenced short story written by George Orwell and published in Describe Orwell's feelings toward the Burmese people and the imperialist British while he works as a police officer in Burma.
Orwell's resentful feelings towards the Burmese are ironic because What irony is expressed in this statement: A sahib has got to act like a sahib; he has got to appear resolute, to know his own mind and do definite things?An analysis of george orwells two conflicting feelings towards the burmese people